About your Search

20121101
20121130
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
organized effort by a number of senators to make sure susan rice is not confirmed." the u.n. ambassador has had little to say publicly since september 16 when she pressed that narrative of the attacks in libya since discounted as false. >> does the president have confidence that susan rice could pass senate confirmation for any post? >> i will not engage in speculation about personnel matters. the president believes that ambassador rice has done an excellent job and is grateful for her service. >>reporter: other reports suggest the she could be named national security advisor a post that does not require senate confirmation. >>shepard: there were suggestions, james, maybe trial balloons, john kerry, former vice presidential candidate could be up for the secretary of state job and he could be appointed to a different cabinet point; that right? >>guest: as chair of the senate foreign relations committee, john kerry has traveled the globe and serves asen unofficial diplomat for the obama administration but the latest reports have john kerry being tapped to head the pentagon as secretary of def
by the whoit house or ambassador to the u.n. it is high time we returned our focus to where it should have been all along. this new time line does not address another sig can't -- significant inconsistency. diplomatic agents were evacuated from the consulate to the airbase in germany. by september 14th, two days before ambassador rice's controversial sunday appearances, fbi agents learned from the consulate agents that there was no demonstration. this single data point that there was no demonstration gutted the anti-islam video theory. fox news asked the director of national intelligence why this information was apparently not included in the talking points, and there was no immediate response, shep. >> katherine, thank you. federal agents announcing they busted another terror plot. but the methods they have used cracking down on those cases are extremely controversial. so how far should the feds be allowed to go in an effort to prevent what they see as a national threat? does the constitution ever get in the way? that's next. >>> there is breaking news on fox newschannel. this just in from the
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)